Esquire Theme by Matthew Buchanan
Social icons by Tim van Damme

12

Dec

Working Media No Longer Works On Its Own & What Brands Should Do About It

Working Media no longer works on its own.  This is far greater than a media buying challenge.  It is actually one of the biggest issues facing every marketer today regardless of size or industry.

We used to maximize the ratio of working to non-working as best we could.

Non-working media includes costs related to production, talent, promotions and fees paid to agencies.  Working media is – plain and simple – paid media, otherwise known as the dollars paid to media partners in return for media impressions.

The old calculus – or current calculus depending on who you are – referenced that 80%+ of any budget should go to fund working media.  For the day, that was completely appropriate.  It was foolish to spend money for line items not directly leading to exposure among a target audience.  For decades, we were basically buying GRPs dressed as a middleman intended to lead us to our goals: awareness, intent and purchase.

At that time, our industry counted TV, radio and print as its workhorses.  Radio and print, while still player, have been largely replaced by digital as the new thoroughbreds of the media mix – specifically: online, mobile and social.  The difference between the old guard and the new one is engagement.  Nobody has ever engaged with a radio spot or a print ad.  They may have taken action, but they could not do so within the unit itself.  Digital changed that landscape starting with the earliest banner and has been changing it again and again ever since.  Even TV, now and forever a critical factor in achieving marketing objectives, is more effective when paired with digital. 

 

THE NEW CALCULUS

 Building relationships is the new marketing.  Engagement is the means that gets us there.  Today, we must start and join conversations, and then tend to them or else we will find ourselves on the outside looking in.  We do so by bringing value to conversations.  Otherwise we are a party guest that neglected to bring a gift for our host and whose sole contribution was standing around talking about ourselves the whole night.

Value is a vague and benign term without definition.  My colleagues and I believe there are three kinds of value: 1) an offer, 2) content and 3) a service or experience.

Nike Plus is a service that delivers value.  Small Business Saturday is an experience that delivers value.  A live streamed concert is content that delivers value.  A ‘friends & family’ coupon is an offer that delivers value.

What do all of these things have in common?  They require non-working media to make them happen: production, technology, conversation management, a monetary incentive.  Line items like these can take the ratio from 80/20 (working to non-working) to 50/50 or beyond.  But funding them is critical for a brand to be successful in building and maintaining relationships with customers and prospects.

This is the new calculus.  And the math works.

Nike+ Fuel Band launched with earned media baked into the product itself.  Sync your daily fuel points and broadcast the results to your social following.  This instance of value-based marketing helped propel the product to sales so strong, it was back ordered immediately following launch.  Small Business Saturday, made offers available to American Express Cardmembers and merchants alike, and drove 67% awareness in the U.S. this year.  More importantly in terms of demonstrating ROI to the company, $5.5B was spent in small businesses on that single day and swipes of Amex cards rose 21% from the year before.  Those are impressive statistics largely driven by social marketing with value at the center.  How many ad-driven campaigns can claim this kind of participatory action?  These are just two examples, but hundreds of others play out in similar fashion.

 

WHAT BRANDS SHOULD DO

Have the guts to shift the mix. That dinner guest who talked about himself all night?  Nobody likes that guy and he usually doesn’t get a second invitation.  Serving the community must be on par with serving the brand.  The best sales pitch is not a sales pitch at all.  Your brand must not be in constant sales mode – in the age of the Facebook News Feed, doing so is both jarring and conspicuous.  Instead of Always Be Closing, try Always Be Creating.  Do so by building value into your budget: make films, give access, provide offers, host chats, lend expertise, do things that are special.  Those special things will get people to engage, share, recommend and advocate – turning non-working investment into earned media that is often far more impactful than the paid variety.

Leverage your working media to help fund your non-working investment.  For brands spending tens of millions of dollars on paid media, a great foundation is already in place.  Choose your paid relationships wisely and you can unlock many of the assets you need to make the engine work.  Yahoo!, NBC and Buzzfeed are content engines.  YouTube and Facebook are leveragable owned channels.  Twitter and LinkedIn are centrifuges for conversation.  Investing paid media dollars with these partners not only provides paid impressions, but can also be used to deliver the content and technology needed to drive these new relationships between brands and audiences.

Find ways to demonstrate ROI in the new ratios. What makes this shift challenging is that brands have a difficult time justifying it.  Spending a greater share on anything but eyeballs goes against the well-worn conventions of advertising.  So: prove it.  Start smaller if that is best – a trial, some smaller investment of funds.  Put the right measurement in place so you are creating attribution for key back-end metrics – not just awareness.  Awareness may have worked to sell television buys to CMOs for the last 50 years, but it does not and cannot stand alone as a rationale for something as complicated as changing the very ratios our industry was built on.  The value-based marketing world does not have a single source measurement champion akin to Nielsen, but it has hundreds of companies working to demonstrate this value.  Find the ones you like, throw a saddle on top and ride.

Look to the pioneers.  There is an old business story suggesting that, for years, Burger King did not scout its own locations, but rather looked to see where McDonald’s was setting up shop and then followed suit.  Following the leader saved them resources.  In marketing, many top brands have been laying the groundwork – first in trial and, now as a matter of course.  Nike, American Express, P&G, Starbucks and Pepsi have all embraced the shift.  If they are moving their dollars to reflect the new calculus, they have likely proved the theory, and it should now be safe for other marketers to do so as well.

08

Aug

How Yahoo! Can (Re)Capture The Imagination of Brands

From my post that appeared this morning in the industry blog “The Makegood” (http://bit.ly/Rpt4wG)

This is another in a long line of unsolicited Marissa Mayer suggestion pieces from around the Internet.  I will stay away from parenting tips as she seems to be getting enough of those.  This one is about business.

What Yahoo! Is Missing: Owned Channels

In the world of paid, owned and earned media, brands are increasingly focused on owned channels.  Owned channels give brands critical real estate in high-trafficked areas and are fertile ground for earned media to flourish.

Before roughly 5 years ago, the term owned channel was basically an unused phrase loosely referring to: address databases, registration lists generated through promotions or the number of monthly visitors to a company website.  While all of these still exist today, they do so alongside a number of newer and more potent spaces: Facebook profiles, Twitter streams, YouTube brand channels, Tumblr feeds, Pinterest boards – and the list goes on.

Each of these is a pathway to engage with customers & prospects, and each of these pathways is an owned channel.  Importantly, they are proving to be just as successful (if not more so) in driving brand objectives than a standard database.

Through these channels, brands have the ability to build dynamic relationships with their audiences.  These channels are the most trustworthy places in which to do so.  Paid media is essentially a rental space: buys are made, banners are run, the budget is spent and the banners ultimately come down.  Owned channels are, if done right, permanent: conversations are started, trust is built, relationships blossom and all participants – the brand and the audience members – have the right and ability to hold a dialogue.

This is valuable space.

The trouble for Yahoo! over the last five years is that they essentially have not offered owned channels for brand use.  Their whole pitch has basically centered on: the ability for scale through paid media.  Yahoo! is obviously one of the biggest platforms on the web.  Advertisers love scale and they get it with Yahoo!  But there is more to life than paid scale especially in an age when so many publishers offer it.

A Fighter’s Chance

This is where the new Yahoo! leadership regime comes in.  I am bullish on Marissa Mayer for a number of reasons.

First, the surprise of her appointment alone was a welcome shock to the Yahoo! storyline.  Do not get me wrong: over the last two years, Yahoo! has done a fantastic job of re-establishing trust with the media community.  Ross Levinsohn brought a lot to the party: the sales team is clicking and that is a difference felt throughout the buying community.  Further, the commitment to original video content is a step in the right direction.  (In fact, if they continue apace, it may well be a differentiator in the category.)  But, shaking things up will not be bad for Yahoo!  I am looking forward to the newness she will bring.

Second, and more importantly, that newness may well come from the product background Mayer carries with her from Google.  Why is this important?  Because Yahoo! already has a number of under-utilized products in its arsenal.  Many of these products are owned channels and, while they may not be discussed as much as Facebook and YouTube, they are compelling in their own right.

There are two such products that provide great examples of owned channels for brands to leverage on Yahoo!

Flickr.  Have you heard of Pinterest?  There is a conversation happening right now at Yahoo! headquarters that goes something like this: Son of a bitch! Pinterest is Flickr!  Why did we not spend more time and energy turning Flickr into a real social network?  Using images, brands communicate with their audiences.  Brands could do so on Flickr.

IntoNow.  IntoNow is an amazing piece of technology purchased by Yahoo! within the last 24 months.  The platform uses Audio Content Recognition technology (think: Shazam) to identify any piece of video content and deliver information about it to users.  That is some highly monetizeable ground.  Think of the possibilities.

With some focus on integrating the technology into other elements of Yahoo! (and beyond), brands could leverage IntoNow as a brilliant owned channel.  In fact, I see this technology as a credible way for Yahoo! to finally find success in the Connected TV space that they have tried to exploit for the last few years.  And, by the way, there is hardly such thing as an owned channel in television, so Yahoo! could create first-mover advantage for themselves.

Where To Go From Here

These are just two examples of how Yahoo! can utilize existing assets to offer owned channels to brands.  To turn them into brand satisfiers (and Yahoo! revenue drivers), work must be done to: a) ready them for brand use, b) educate the sales team on how to position and sell them and c) build and acquire new technologies to make the Yahoo! owned channel offering set more potent.

Yahoo! has a way to go (re)capture the imagination of the brand community the way others have in recent years.  But if they follow these steps, owned channels along with the scale offered on the platform, could position them nicely in the coming years.